<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d17829824\x26blogName\x3dWrong+Side+of+the+Tracks\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://wrongjr.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://wrongjr.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d7706307521957129916', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
          CONTACT     |      ABOUT     |      SEARCH     |      RECENT POSTS     |      ARCHIVES     |      BLOGS, &TC     |      RELIGION     |      ENTERTAINMENT     |      MEDIA     |      IDEAS     |     

12.08.2005    |    Keeping the barn door closed...
...now that the horse has escaped. This is the apparent message from the wretched overreaction to the killing of one (apparently) loony passenger who claimed to have a bomb on board (story here). The fact that the man did not have a bomb, but was (again, apparently) simply off his meds could not have been known by the air marshal who did the right thing by shooting him.

The marshal did the only reasonable thing he could have. He rendered the man incapable of setting of a bomb. Ever. After this, the only thing that should have happened is a check on who the dead man was, and a brief interview with all the passengers to see if there was any indication that the man was part of a wider, or any, plot.

However, in addition to this, what followed was classic government overkill. The marching of the passengers, hands on heads, as if they were all perps. The dramatic, and totally unnecessary, blowing up of the dead man's luggage. Uh, fellas, perhaps we could run it through one of our x-ray machines, and perhaps get some dogs to sniff it? Nope. Too easy. Let's blow it up; we like things that go boom.

Well, the inept and bloated Transportation Insecurity Agency had to appear to be doing something. What they will not do is profile, thereby saving the 99.99% rest of us from being hasseled. What they may now be starting to do, a little too late, is to actually screen people by their appearance and behavior.

What the TSA has not done is to actually look for terrorists, as opposed to looking for sharp objects. Not that sharp objects and guns aren't all too easy to get past the minimum wage slackers who staff most security checkpoints. Hey, you get what you pay for. What we've gotten is the outward appearance of commercial aviation security.

Until some schmuck forgets to take his meds and gets blown away for being nuts. Poor bastard, but at least the message is broadcast: our marshals may not know any unarmed combat, but they'll blow you away as soon as look at you if you say the wrong thing.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home






about this blog

I was born, grew up, and went to school in the Bronx, New York -- on the wrong side of the tracks. Got the chance to go to college, so instead of joining the NYPD (the obvious career choice at that time and place), I became an engineer. Spent some years designing things that go boom (or things that take things that go boom to their destinations...), principally for our military. Also took an interesting career turn and for some years was in charge of counter-terrorism for my agency...so I learned something about guns. And when to use them.

I am a believer, in God. Christian. My opinion of most denominations is that they seem to be more concerned with the collection plate and devising intricate rules as to who is in and who is out.

My politics are a mix of conservative and libertarian, as in live and let live. With one exception, I favor small government, maximum personal freedom, coupled with personal responsibility and accountability for one's actions. I also know that there are, and have always been, things that are true, and things that are not. Two problems: Being smart enough to know which is which, and having the guts to act on it. I make no claims...

The exception to small government? I favor a robust national defense, against enemies foreign, and domestic. Or, as Teddy Roosevelt should have said, "speak softly and carry a whole bunch of armored divisions."

This blog will focus on politics, culture, religion, national security. That's pretty much the same territory as the New York Times. Just that I will never label my opinions as "news."



top of page